Friday, January 13, 2006

Performing Literature

One excuse Laura Albert, Geoffrey Knoop, Savannah Albert, JoAnna Albert and, by proxy, Carolyn F. Albert -- i.e. JT Leroy -- could come up with is that they've been working in the same medium as Maurizio Cattelan. As some might remember, for some time, Cattelan would refuse to appear in public, having a friend stand-in for him at news conferences and the like to be being "the face"/"the voice" of Maurizio Cattelan. (Sonja Wessel's question in this interview slightly touches on this aspect of his work.) Thus, Leroy and Co. could say they've perpetrated one of the most amazing performance art collectives of all time.

Now if we could only figure out an excuse for James Frey.

Thursday, January 12, 2006

Mies is Murder

Modern architecture is killing birds!

The Wonderful World of Blogs

I've decided to replace my obsession with Sudoku with another equally fascinating activity: blog-surfing. Yesterday, I started clicking on the "Next Blog" button on the Blogger toolbar and have already come across some happy discoveries: Swamptorium, full of found photographs and other odds and ends; Operation Blue Jay, devoted to pictures of a naval tour of Scandanavia; Adrian Laino shows y video, a tribute to Adrian Laino, who seems to be a minor salsa superstar; and Cordayology and Mark Greene, MD, ER fan fiction blogs!

Wednesday, January 11, 2006

The Puzzling Aesthetics of Elizabeth Murray

Those who know me would probably agree that I'm a minimalist at heart, no matter how messy my room is. The first painter I fell in love with was Barnett Newman. Then came Agnes Martin. Then Brice Marden. Then Sue Williams, especially the squiggles-on-white stuff. You get the picture. I have a love for line and open spaces, rich color and aching simplicity.

So it was no wonder that, when I went to Elizabeth Murray's mid-career retrospective at MoMA this winter, I would fall in love with "Pink Spiral Leap" (1975). But the rest, of course, puzzled me entirely. I decided that I didn't like looking at her work. I decided I could appreciate the art historical references -- Cubism, still lives in general, Frank Stella, maybe even... dare I say it?... Keith Haring. I also liked -- even loved -- that she was humorous. But I still felt like I was left with something that is just too Martin Lawrence Gallery for me to handle!

And that triggered a different kind of interest: I started to get excited about her work because it punctures my personal notions of visual propriety.

Reading Carroll Dunham's article, "Shapes of Things to Come," today was enlightening (it's from Artforum's October 2004 issue). It was nice to look at the paintings again and be confused because I think confusion is precisely the nerve that Murray is trying to hit. What her work reveals is an energetic courage that completely changes the boundaries of what a painting or a sculpture can be. She does that Duchampian thing of saying "Look at art this way" without using products from the real world, just her own representations of them. She likes cups. She likes paint brushes. So she paints them and then blows them up, sucks them in, puts them through any number of wacky run-arounds to get to strange, jolting forms. Put a different way, she's collaging together different notions of art history within her art-making and expressing them in strictly formal ways. I suppose that's how I'm looking at Murray's work at the moment. I think that's what makes it difficult. I think that's why I'm starting to warm up to it.

Why Madonna Can Get Away with Faux-Humping a Stereo

Music Video Review
Artist: Madonna
Video: "Hung Up"
Album: Confessions on a Dance Floor
Director: Johan Renck

Madonna, now a 47 year-old mother of two, looks pretty fucking amazing. In this latest video, Madonna's slight transformation into a `70s disco diva registers complete. For most of it, she's clad in a shimmery pink wrap, magenta leotard, practice tights, dainty heels, and a sequined belt. And as she kicks and pirouettes--and even when she pulses her crotch while sitting propped up on the floor--there's not a wrinkle or fat-flab in sight. Though I wonder whether or not Kabballah water really is the source of youth, what makes this 5 minutes and 31 seconds of pure pleasure is not simply Madonna's age-defying anatomy. It is the age-defying pulse of the video itself. It deftly maneuvers the simple, undeniable fact that dancing is fun and that, as "Flashdance" as it might sound, dancing well is a sure sign of a youthful kind of cool.

The video begins with Madonna strolling into a darkened studio, flipping on the lights, taking off her sweats, and turning on a hefty, black, light-blinking boombox. She and her pink leotard warm up and sway to the first beats of "Hung Up." And then the tempo picks up and the momentum begins to churn. Interspersed with well-timed cuts of Madonna practicing her twinkle-toes repertoire, the supporting content of the video is a series of four energetic vignettes of other dancers -- all over the world -- who are gettin' down. And what links them together, of course, is this big, black boombox blaring Madonna's addictive single and, even more palpable in the video, the infectious power of dance.

The first is a crowd of break-dancer like dudes hanging out on the roof and stairs of a concrete housing project. These guys bounce from wall to wall, walk down steps in backbends, fashion backflips, and do all manner of impressive, urban, break-dancer-y things. They set the fast, quick-cut pace for the video. The second group is a couple of kids in South Central Los Angeles waiting at a bus stop. The blinking stereo makes its way to the bench, and ghetto-fabulous dancing commences. One young upstart pushes everyone motionless and starts strutting her stuff, down to a split. As she dances her little heart out, everyone else piles into a cab and--in a witty move-- she's left behind in disappointment. Then there's the scene with a Chinese fishmonger hanging out behind the counter. He suddenly hears the music, slaps the fish around his shoulder like a prop, and starts gettin' down. Others join, including a Catholic schoolgirl, and they, too, start synching up with the beat.

Halfway through, night begins to fall and we see our friends from South Central getting out of a typical black London taxi cab, much to their surprise. We then catch a glimpse of them South Central friends riding a crowded car of the Tube, where a gyrating guy sparks a dance-off. When his puffed chest doesn't do the trick, a zaftig woman shows him down. Out on the streets, Madonna, now in a leather jacket and jeans, walks down an alley, paying homage to John Travolta's first scene in "Saturday Night Fever." And then we arrive at the club. Madonna and fellow club-goers lean across and over each other in slow motion, indulging in artsier Martha Grahm-style pile-ups. But then a new wave of fun washes over the video: we not only get cut to scenes of Madonna fake-humping her light-tastic stereo, we also get to see her making Dance Dance Revolution look legitimately cool. The video culminates with other clubbers surrounding DDR in all its glory, dancing collectively and then breaking out into the hustle. And everyone keeps dancing the night away.

I realize that I've now spent three paragraphs simply summarizing the content of the video, but the feats of bodily contortion and quick, short cuts kept my foot tapping all the way through; thus, doing precisely what the video aims to inject in its viewers. Even though it might be slightly creepy to think of her kids seeing the video, Madonna comes out on top not only because of her divine fitness, but because she is a lead star with restraint. The idea of self-promotion is one that taints videomaking in general, and Madonna certainly does become the primary, most-viewed icon for all that is "Hung Up." But what becomes the captivating feature of these 5.2 minutes is that she doesn't over-do it and she sticks to something that is both contemporary and spans the ages (or, at least the last 30 years).

I started thinking about whether or not I could imagine a younger pop star at the helm of the video. Pre-preggers Britney Spears was the obvious substitute. But Britney is too flashy for something this surprisingly down-to-earth, such a seemingly low-concept of a production. This is purely Madonna, but Madonna-as-sage-purveyor of youth. She and Renck strike a universal appeal by tapping into the low-key, everyman coolness of people hanging out and dancing. What's great is that it's not apparent that these individuals are members of any company; they just like dancing. This hang-out quality of the video even allows humor to make cameo appearances: the show-off getting left behind, the fishmonger using a slimy cod as a prop, and that large woman showing up a slight, overconfident homey. These quick moments certainly don't reek of Madonna's self-importance; they're just general, dorkily cute anecdotes. And along with this, Madonna throws Dance Dance Revolution and the hustle in for good measure. The fact that she can cobble together all of these seemingly disparate elements, faux-hump a stereo, and still manage to look cool indicates her mastery -- and Renck's -- of the popular appeal of the music video medium.

When I first watched "Hung Up" with my friend Genevieve, we were actually compelled to rewind the DVR back to the beginning. We wanted to see it again and imitate Madonna's many moves. She fared far better than I did; my kick-ball-change suffers from little aptitude. But it was proof-positive that this is the kind of video that makes you want to kick up your heels, perfect your Moonwalk, and watch the video all over again. It might even trick you into believing that Madonna is fifteen years younger because the video plugs into something larger than even she is. It ultimately proves that Madonna is as inventive, hip, and on top of her game as any diva could hope to be.

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

George Saunders

Here are two great George Saunders things:
  • "Bohemians" - a story published almost two years ago. I just rediscovered it in my back issues a couple weeks ago. It was noted as Saunders's move from hyperrealism to realism, but all I could think as I read it was: This is America!
  • An interview with Robert Birnbaum. My favorite part is after the mid-way point and Saunders talks about how great it was to see Tobias Wolf as "a nice person. A loving and loved person" instead of the tortured, manic, insane artist-writer that so pervades public imagination of what characterizes brilliant writers.

Monday, January 09, 2006

Arthur Lubow's Times article, "The New Leipzig School," is fantastic. Not only do we get a biographical view of the highly inventive, strange-named superstar Neo Rauch, but we get this great nugget:

"[Christian references and Greek myths] were used in a very intelligent way and could be read by people who were intelligent and had a higher level of education," Rink says. "Nobody paints a Sisyphus or Icarus anymore. Artists are free to interpret the world without enigmatic tools."


Rink, Neo Rauch's painting professor at the Leipzig academy, sees freedom in the open-ended possibilities of making art. What makes this interesting is that this turn -- from iconography to open-field -- changed the entire way in which spectators approach modern/contemporary art. In my opinion, the act of someone else looking is what turns art from being 'useless' to being meaningful. (But more on that, Foucault, and Barthes in a longer post...) Because art has taken such different forms in the past forty years, from conceptual art to video art, looking at contemporary art has become a slightly demanding proposition. Around the beginning of the 20th century, engaged viewers of contemporary art were expected to shift away from traditional Icaruses to a working knowledge of Duchamp's "Fountain."

Thus, an artist's art historical interests and the viewers' knowledge about them can tip the scales of looking at art from a simple exercise in browsing to thinking in visual terms. Surely art history was useful for looking at art for viweers in the past, but especially today it seems that a little knowledge can help viewers suspend their disbelief about conceptual and abstracted forms. Artists are creating their ideas in visual forms for us to think about; and, as I see it, looking intelligently is what gives dignity to the whole enterprise.